If the ICC’s mandate were based on popularity…

In a recent post, the Enough blog discussed a poll by WorldPublicOpinion.org that showed there is much popularity for the indictment of Omar al-Bashir among the populations of some African countries — contrary to the position of the AU, which has rejected the ICC’s move.

Maybe African leaders are “out of step” with their populaces, Enough suggested. And in another post, the group questioned the judgment of those leaders for other reasons. An excerpt:

The AU includes a fair number of leaders with a lot of blood on their hands, so it’s no surprise that they would seek to shield themselves from individual prosecution.  But for the victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity, the institutionalization within the AU of impunity for the likes of Bashir, Mugabe, Deby, Meles, Issayas, Kagame, and Gaddafi is deeply troubling.

I have no idea how thorough the poll is, but the Enough posts raise a few issues in my mind:

  • Is the ICC’s mandate based on public opinion or law? And if you argue that public opinion should guide it, doesn’t that reinforce the idea that it’s a body guided by politics, and not justice?
  • If having blood on your hands is the rubric for judging what say you get to have over the ICC, then what to make of the fact that this case originated with the UN Security Council? The permanent members’ records are probably a big reason Arab states oppose the indictment.

It just seems like people want the ICC to be a pure vehicle for justice sometimes, and then are totally fine with discussing it like it’s a political body the next moment. Whatever suits the overall agenda.

Image by Brymo on Flickr.

Image by Brymo on Flickr.

One thought on “If the ICC’s mandate were based on popularity…

  1. Astutely observed. Masochists do the same thing all the time: Theoretically, there are lines they refuse to cross in principle, but when it’s go time, all of a sudden they start making exceptions to all those “rules” they told you to follow. “Well, maybe we could say that politics should play a role, but just this once! And remember that the safety word is “Kentucky!” That’s how it starts. Then, before you know it, they’re constantly talking about the ICC in terms of popularity rather than blind justice and begging you to put out your cigarettes on the insides of their elbows. I’ve seen it a million times. Sadly, no one sticks to their guns in the worlds of advocacy or S&M.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s